Friday, October 16, 2009

Musing 2

In today's Times of India, the interview brings out more of 'Venki' Ramakrishnan. Let's try to understand what he wants to say and imbibe the spirit.
-----------------------------
‘A little less nationalistic hero worship please’
— Venki Ramakrishnan
Iam distressed by the reaction to my comment about being deluged by emails from India, and realize I have inadvertently hurt people, for which I apologize. I hope people realize that I have no personal secretary and use my email mainly for work, so finding important communications became very difficult. I want to make it clear that I was delighted to hear from scientific colleagues and students whom I had met personally over the years in India and elsewhere, as well as close friends with whom I had lost touch. Unlike real celebrities like movie stars or people in sports, we scientists generally lead a quiet life, and are not psychologically equipped to handle publicity. So, I found the barrage of emails from people whom I didn’t know or whom I only knew slightly almost 40 years ago (nearly all from Indians) difficult to deal with. People have also taken offence at my comment about nationality being an accident of birth. However, they don’t seem to notice the first part of the sentence: We are all human beings. Accident or not, I remain grateful to all the dedicated teachers I had throughout my years. Others have said I have disowned my roots. Since 2002, I have come almost every year to India. In these visits, I have spent time on institute campuses giving lectures or talking to colleagues and students about their work, and stayed in the campus guest house. I have not spent my time staying in fancy hotels and going sightseeing without them. The people I visited, eg at the ICGEB in Delhi, CCMB in Hyderabad, the University of Madras or the IISc in Bangalore can vouch for this. Finally, at a personal level, although I am westernized, many aspects of culture like a love for classical Indian music or South Indian or Gujarati food are simply a part of me. The best way to take pleasure in someone’s achievement is to take an interest in their work and feel motivated to learn more about science. I remember reading about Gellman’s work as an undergraduate in Baroda, and, when he won the Nobel prize, rushing upstairs to tell my parents. It did not matter to me whether he was Indian or not. In my case, I am lucky to have had a combination of education, opportunities and a great team of co-workers to have made a contribution to an important problem. I am not personally that important. If I hadn’t existed, this work would still have been done. It is the work that is important, and that should be what excites people. Finally, there are many excellent scientists in India and elsewhere who will never win a Nobel prize. But their work is no less interesting and people should find out about what they do. My visits to India confirm that it has great potential and bright young students. A little less nationalistic hero worship will go a long way to fulfil that potential.

1 comment:

Goutam Saha said...

Economic Times : 19.12.2010

VENKATRAMAN RAMAKRISHNAN
NOBEL LAUREATE
Give 20 yrs to Indian institutes
Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, who shared the Nobel prize for Chemistry in 2009, is currently on a visit to India. He spoke to Gaurie Agtey Athale in Pune. Excerpts:

Is there a lack of research in the curricula of Indian universities, leading to people of Indian origin doing well when they go abroad?
There is a lot of excitement and exciting things happening in Indian science. The government is funding science in a big way and setting up new institutes. Besides, I am the wrong person to ask questions about Indian curriculum or systems because I left India at the age of 19.
But where are the results? There isn’t a single Nobel working in the country...
There are no results today because there is a lot of nurturing needed by the Indian scientific community. It takes twenty years for sustainable results. One generation has to do well... then there is need for continuity. Institutes have to become sustainable. So, give them at least another twenty years.
Institutes and local scientific community complain about lack of funding...
The government began to invest in science after
1990, when the Indian economy was opened up. Before this, the investments were low. Give it some time—a generation maybe. The sustainability and continuity of research institutes is mandatory because there may be a good person at the head of an institute but what if he retires early? Research needs continuity. There are some remarkably fine traditional institutes in India such as the Tata Fundamental Research Institute, the Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology and National Centre for Biological Sciences. They have been working for a long time and doing good work. There is a misperception about their contribution and there are too few such institutes.
So, what according to you is the biggest challenge faced by Indian science today?
To attract good faculty that work overseas. That is the main problem—to get young scientists to come here and fill faculty positions, giving them the freedom to work. I cannot compare the Indian system to the West since I left at 19 and have not been part of the system here. But yes, salaries are much better than they were 50 years ago, the infrastructure facilities are also a lot better now. A lot of young people are returning. I know of one young structural biologist who is coming back (from the UK’s Cambridge University), to ISSER, Pune.